Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Sign in / Register
5
5368blood-oxygen-monitor
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Issues 45
    • Issues 45
    • List
    • Board
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
  • Bette Leonski
  • 5368blood-oxygen-monitor
  • Issues
  • #35

Closed
Open
Opened Oct 01, 2025 by Bette Leonski@betteleonski69
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Here's Why Apple Watch Series 6 Blood Oxygen Tracking Didn’t Need FDA Approval


Apple beforehand had to work hard at getting the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approval so that it may possibly equip the Apple Watch with ECG features. The FDA approval meant that the feature, first launched within the Apple Watch Series 4, can be utilized for medical purposes in order that it can assist users get a better image of their health. The approval additionally means the characteristic may help medical professionals take better care of their patients. Apple, however, BloodVitals tracker did not need to go through the same means of acquiring the FDA approval before with the ability to equip the brand new Apple Watch Series 6 with the a lot-hyped Blood Oxygen monitoring characteristic. Why did not the corporate need the FDA's approval? It's simply because the Blood Oxygen monitoring function discovered in the Apple Watch is not designed for BloodVitals tracker medical makes use of. Before Apple was able to equip the Apple Watch Series four fashions with the useful electrocardiogram (ECG) function, it had to amass approval from the FDA in order to make use of it.


This included submitting documentation proving that the ECG feature on the Apple Watch works just as well as different ECG devices out there. It, nonetheless, BloodVitals SPO2 did not must go through the identical course of with the SpO2 monitor. The Verge reported that by saying the function is meant for "general wellness" uses and BloodVitals tracker Apple did not need to get the FDA's approval anymore. This workaround, the report acknowledged, permits the Cupertino tech big to sell the device with the feature, as lengthy as it would not promote it as being used for "medical" makes use of. Matt Grennan, assistant professor of health care management in the Wharton School on the University of Pennsylvania, informed The Verge that the FDA does not regulate certain products, including that it'd be difficult for BloodVitals tracker the FDA to regulate all digital well being products released out there. Apple's choice to skip FDA approval and name the Apple Watch's SpO2 monitoring function as something that is "not meant for medical use," nonetheless, might show harmful - particularly to those who can't tell the distinction between a feature used for wellness and another that is used for medical functions. "A lot of occasions, patients and consumers don’t really understand the difference. So they’ll start utilizing the system and relying on the knowledge," Michael Matheny, co-director of the center for Improving the Public’s Health by Informatics at Vanderbilt University, advised The Verge.


Posts from this matter will probably be added to your day by day electronic mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this topic will be added to your daily electronic mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this matter can be added to your each day e-mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this author might be added to your daily electronic mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this creator will probably be added to your each day electronic mail digest and your homepage feed. Five years since the first Apple Watch and a full seven years on from Samsung’s Galaxy Gear, we all know what a smartwatch is. We know that it’s not going to exchange your smartphone anytime soon, that it'll have to be charged daily or two, and that its best capabilities are for health tracking and seeing notifications when your phone isn’t in your hand. Samsung’s newest smartwatch, the $399-and-up Galaxy Watch 3, doesn't do something to alter these expectations.


Actually, there isn’t much difference between the Galaxy Watch three and any smartwatch that’s come out in the past few years - at least in terms of core functionality. If you’ve managed to disregard or avoid smartwatches for the previous half-decade, the Watch three isn’t going to alter your thoughts or win you over. None of that is to say the Galaxy Watch 3 is a bad smartwatch and even a nasty product. Quite the opposite, the Watch 3 fulfills the definition and BloodVitals SPO2 expectations that we’ve accepted for smartwatches perfectly adequately. It does the things we expect a smartwatch to do - observe your activity and provide fast entry to notifications - just positive. And if you’re an Android (or even better, a Samsung) phone owner on the lookout for a brand new smartwatch, BloodVitals tracker the Galaxy Watch three is a tremendous choose. The Galaxy Watch three follows Samsung’s tradition of creating a smartwatch look just like a traditional watch, full with a spherical face.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
No due date
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: betteleonski69/5368blood-oxygen-monitor#35